Court Orders University of Virginia to Produce Documents of Dr. Michael Mann
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Wednesday, May 25, 2011
Contacts:
Christopher Horner, chris.horner@atinstitute.org
Paul Chesser, paul.chesser@atinstitute.org
MANASSAS, Va.—On Tuesday, more than four months after the American Tradition Institute’s Environmental Law Center requested emails and other files from a specifically identified University of Virginia back-up computer, the University was hauled into court and made to stand and agree to comply with the Commonwealth’s Freedom of Information Act (FOIA).
See all court documents, press releases, media coverage of ATI’s case against UVA
Under Virginia’s FOIA, ATI and co-petitioner Delegate Bob Marshall (R-Manassas) asked UVA to disgorge the emails and files that Virginia’s Attorney General also sought under other authority. The emails are specific communications sent and received by Dr. Michael Mann during his tenure at UVA in which he corresponded with, or discussed other, leading voices that represent the climate alarmist perspective. Seminal among them include discussions about his now infamous and discredited 1,000-year temperature reconstruction known as the “hockey stick.” There also already appears — from records ATI has received – to be additional information of the kind released in the “Climategate” emails that originated at the Climatic Research Unit at East Anglia University.
Under FOIA the University was required to produce the documents within five days of its receipt of payment for “accessing, duplicating, supplying or searching” for the documents. Alternatively they could have entered into an agreement with ATI on when they would supply the documents, or they could have gone to court to ask for more time. They did none of the above. Instead they promised to provide some of the documents “shortly” on April 6; then specifically on May 6, 2011; and always stated they would get to the others later on. They did none of this either, so ATI went to court to compel production and compliance with the law.
ATI finally received the first approximately 20 percent of the 9,000 pages of documents that UVA says are responsive to ATI’s request and that it possesses, only after ATI filed its petition, and two working days before the judicial hearing. Most of what ATI received in this seemingly hurried production, which was more focused on showing volume than content, were ads for Halloween costumes, public news releases from lay and scientific journals, and a few emails that were printed in computer code so as to be unintelligible in that form. Despite this product of (according to the University) 75 hours of review and more than four months, the University stopped work on producing anything further. Nevertheless some substance made it through UVA’s filter, which ATI will discuss after we review the withheld records.
The failure of UVA to honor its own commitments or to follow the law forced ATI to petition the court for relief. ATI filed its petition on May 16th, and the Court heard the matter Tuesday.
It took a petition to force UVA to agree to produce the documents that by statute they should already have produced. The day before the court hearing, UVA finally agreed to a date when they must produce all the documents they believe are not protected from disclosure. The court entered an order that forces UVA to honor that agreement and to produce the documents in easy-to-read electronic form so that ATI can make them available to all who wish to review the work of this highly controversial former Virginia employee. They must produce those documents by August 22nd.
In addition ATI has won the right to look at all the documents beginning no later than September 21, including those the University refuses to make public. The court issued a protective order that allows ATI’s attorneys, David Schnare and Christopher Horner, to see them all so that they can challenge any further UVA refusals to supply what the public paid for. The records constitute a history of the “hockey stick” and the activities of Michael Mann, who also during the relevant time served on, e.g., the UN’s IPCC, all of which have been the subject of intense scrutiny.
“By the end of this year, ATI and UVA will obtain judicial review of the University’s obligation to fulfill the public’s right to know how taxpayer-funded employees use the taxpayer’s resources,” said Mr. Horner, director of litigation at ATI’s Environmental Law Center. “The court will determine whether this can be hidden behind the ivy covered walls of our public colleges and universities under a non-existent FOIA exemption of ‘academic freedom,’ which Virginia’s legislature has never recognized.”
ATI also put a final issue before the court. Under the Virginia FOIA, UVA is not allowed to impose fees on ATI to recoup the general costs of creating or maintaining records, or of transacting the general business of the University. The University has already admitted that it must obey several laws in fulfillment of its duty to protect some of its records, such as medical files and student information. This is part of the business of the University, just as any governmental body must protect its sensitive records. UVA, however, demanded that ATI pay $8,500 to offset UVA’s costs of doing precisely this regular business, which must be performed when releasing any information, under any authority. ATI argued, and existing case law indicates, this is simply not allowed. The University disagreed, and the court will issue its opinion on that matter on June 15th.
“ATI pursues important public issues,” said Dr. Schnare, director of ATI’s Environmental Law Center. “This case is about whether the government can put up a pay wall to frustrate the public’s right to transparency. If it can, the public can’t hold government employees to the high standards of conduct they should meet.”
See Prince William County (Va.) Court’s Order to Produce Documents in ATI Environmental Law Center’s Freedom of Information Act case against the University of Virginia (PDF).
See Prince William County (Va.) Court’s Order on Protection of Documents in ATI Environmental Law Center’s Freedom of Information Act case against the University of Virginia (PDF).
For an interview with American Tradition Institute senior director of litigation Christopher Horner, email chris.horner@atinstitute.org or call (202)670-2680.
[...] http://www.atinstitute.org/court-orders-university-of-virginia-to/ [...]
[...] Let's keep these frauds who flout the law and prtoect their own interests and buddies using our tax money, on the run. Court Orders University of Virginia to Produce Documents of Dr. Michael Mann [...]
[...] Court Orders University of Virginia to Produce Documents of Dr. Michael Mann [...]
[...] acting on behalf of The American Tradition Institute (ATI) have succeeded in getting a court order requiring the University of Virginia to release Mann’s emails by August 22, 2001. The total cost ATI will be required to pay appears to remain in dispute. ATI [...]
[...] Cuccinelli got boned by a judge whose wife works at UVA and is appealing. But by then Chris Horner may already have made everything public–so we can all play Hide The [...]
[...] Your Ad Here Court Orders University of Virginia to Produce Documents of Dr. Michael Mann At last they are beginning to realise they are not above the law. Temperatures (and sea [...]
[...] state judge this week ordered the University of Virginia to stop stonewalling on a Freedom of Information Request for emails from Michael Mann, the creator of the much-disputed [...]
[...] week ATI’s request for Mann’s records went before a Prince William County judge, who ordered that UVA provide the taxpayer-underwritten records to ATI in electronic form within 90 days. In [...]
[...] released above was to condemn Ken Cuccinelli for his supposed over reaching in his case against the University of Virginia and Dr. Michael Mann. It couldn’t be that Michael Mann actually did commit fraud and may in fact have something to [...]
[...] In Virginia, we’re talking about half a million of dollars of Virginia state funds. Because of the CRU/ClimateGate emails, it seems conceivable if not likely to AG Cuccinelli and others that Mann has committed a fraud against taxpayers as defined in a pretty clearly worded bill of the Commonwealth of Virginia. Cuccinelli wants to see Mann’s e-mails. Thankfully, the American traditions Institute has stepped in and gotten those emails. [...]
[...] cited actions taken by American Tradition Institute’s Environmental Law Center in its efforts to obtain records of Climategate scientist Dr. Michael Mann from the University of Virginia, and its efforts to obtain outside employment records of climate [...]
[...] cited actions taken by American Tradition Institute’s Environmental Law Center in its efforts to obtain records of Climategate scientist Dr. Michael Mann from the University of Virginia, and its efforts to obtain outside employment records of climate [...]
[...] of our state Representatives have come out against Ken Cuccinelli and his fraud investigation of Dr. Michael Mann and his planned EPA lawsuit. Libby Garvey has laughingly chimed in here. We covered David [...]
[...] scrutiny of taxpayer-funded science by academics, asked the University of Virginia to disregard its court-ordered agreement with American Tradition Institute to provide the records of former climate scientist Dr. Michael [...]
[...] scrutiny of taxpayer-funded science by academics, asked the University of Virginia to disregard its agreement before the court with American Tradition Institute to provide the records of former climate scientist Dr. Michael [...]
[...] organization, American Tradition Institute, initiated two public records requests (which have turned into Freedom of Information Act lawsuits) for the work of key figureheads in the government-funded [...]
[...] disk that contains 3,827 pages by the court-ordered due date. The University has said in the past there are approximately 9,000 pages responsive to ATI’s FOIA [...]
[...] ackuna_src = "en";The climate models are crap, this is why Phil Jones and Michael Mann resist a judge’s order to release their data. In this exchange they talk about how to make models look more accurate and the most telling [...]
[...] requested a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) that the University of Virginia release emails and specified files that display correspondence and communications sent and received by Mann while during his tenure at [...]