Author Archive

Losing equipment and hiding records from the public.

Originally posted at American Spectator.

Yesterday a dozen liberal and academic (but I repeat myself) groups rose in defense of Penn State Climategate scientist Michael Mann, making up reasons such as “academic freedom” to deny American Tradition Institute‘s request for Mann’s emails and records from the University of Virginia, his previous employer. ATI, where I am executive director, is asking for similar records that Virginia Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli has asked for under the state’s Fraud Against Taxpayers Act, but has been denied so far by the university and lower courts. We request the documents under Virginia’s Freedom of Information Act. Both of us are curious about Mann’s activities at UVA when he came up with that “Hockey Stick” temperature chart that ignored the Medieval Warm Period, but helped fuel the AlGorean chants of global warming alarmism a few years ago. He got government grants for his work.

The defenders of Mann include the ACLU of Virginia, People for the American Way, American Association of University Professors, Council of Environmental Deans and Directors, Union of Scientists Concerned About Their Grant Funding, and that heavyweight of heavyweights, The Ornithological Council. From their collective authorship:

The undersigned organizations, dedicated both to academic freedom and the exchange of scholarly and scientific ideas and to the critically important ideals of government transparency that are embodied by FOIA, urge the University of Virginia to…balanc(e) the interests in public disclosure against the public interest in academic freedom, which the University of Virginia has recognized in its faculty handbook as “an essential ingredient of an environment of academic excellence.”

Unfortunately university faculty handbooks don’t trump state laws, as ATI explained in our response to the groups’ letter:

ATI’s FOIA request is not on behalf of government, but of taxpayers, who have the right to know how and where their dollars are spent - or misspent. “Academic freedom” is not a legitimate exemption, any more than “bureaucratic freedom” is an acceptable exemption for state government employees. The coverage of state universities is very clear in Virginia’s Freedom of Information laws.

ATI’s Chris Horner also notes in our response how these groups were missing in action on the “academic freedom” front when Greenpeace demanded the records of Mann’s former UVA colleague, Patrick Michaels, a climate alarmism skeptic. Same goes for several other skeptical scientists at other institutions where Greenpeace inquired.

In other Penn State news, I see that “The Amazing Revkin,” who also goes by Andy, will be featured at the university’s 2011 Colloquium on the Environment. PSU describes in part the New York Times blogger with this laugh line: “While the media largely ignored the climate story until the last several years, Revkin spent more than 20 years immersed in this subject….”

The story of Andy as pioneer — ought to be fun.

Originally posted at American Spectator.

That’s after I relayed yesterday that the U.S. burns “only” 25 percent of its corn as biofuels, which Associated Press insinuated was no big deal. Now this from the New York Times:

Each year, an ever larger portion of the world’s crops - cassava and corn, sugar and palm oil - is being diverted for biofuels as developed countries pass laws mandating greater use of nonfossil fuels and as emerging powerhouses like China seek new sources of energy to keep their cars and industries running….

But with food prices rising sharply in recent months, many experts are calling on countries to scale back their headlong rush into green fuel development, arguing that the combination of ambitious biofuel targets and mediocre harvests of some crucial crops is contributing to high prices, hunger and political instability.

This year, the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization reported that its index of food prices was the highest in its more than 20 years of existence. Prices rose 15 percent from October to January alone, potentially “throwing an additional 44 million people in low- and middle-income countries into poverty,” the World Bank said.

Soaring food prices have caused riots or contributed to political turmoil in a host of poor countries in recent months, including Algeria, Egypt and Bangladesh, where palm oil, a common biofuel ingredient, provides crucial nutrition to a desperately poor populace. During the second half of 2010, the price of corn rose steeply - 73 percent in the United States - an increase that the United Nations World Food Program attributed in part to the greater use of American corn for bioethanol.

This after the AP reported yesterday:

Ethanol producers acknowledge they’ve increased demand for corn but say it’s not enough to affect food prices.

Matt Hartwig, a spokesman for the Renewable Fuels Association, said the ethanol industry only uses about 25 percent of the nation’s corn supply.

So who are you going to believe: the UN World Food Program, or a flack for the Renewable Fuels Association? I know, some choice.

Originally posted at American Spectator.